Benefits and risks of finFETs compared to Bulk transistor.
STRENGTHS
|
WEAKNESSES
|
Significant reduction in power consumption (~50% over 32nm)
|
Very restrictive design options, especially for analog – Transistor drive strength is quantized to multiples of a single fin width
|
Faster switching speed
|
Fin width variability and edge quality leads to variability in threshold voltage VT
|
Effective speed/power trade-off possible with multi-Vt
|
Extra manufacturing complexity and expense (~+3% according to Intel)
|
Availability of strain engineering
| |
OPPORTUNITIES
|
THREATS
|
Low power makes 20nm technology deployable for mobile applications
|
The potentially superior electrical performance and simpler manufacturing of fully depleted SOI
|
Increase CPU speeds beyond 4GHz
|
Benefits and risks of FD-SOI compared to Bulk transistor.
STRENGTHS
|
WEAKNESSES
|
Significant reduction in power consumption
|
High cost of initial wafers (~+10% over regular wafers, according to Intel)
|
Faster switching speed
|
Limited number of wafer suppliers
|
Easier, standard manufacturing process
|
Variability in VT due to variations in the thickness of silicon thin-film
|
Availability of back-biasing to control VT
|
Multi- VT more complex to implement
|
No doping variability
|
Lack of strain engineering
|
Layout library compatible with existing bulktechnologies
|
Thin channel limits drive strength
|
OPPORTUNITIES
|
THREATS
|
Simpler and more flexible alternative to finFETs if wafer cost issue can be overcome
|
High wafer cost threatens economic viability for wider market adoption
|
Better controllability for analog applications
|
No comments:
Post a Comment